Sunday, October 25, 2009

Precocious Precious

Please read the excerpt from a recent New York Times Magazine story. Respond to the director's claim in the last paragraph. Do you agree or disagree? Why? I have posted the link to the entire article if you are interested.

October 25, 2009

The Audacity of ‘Precious’

I.

At the Cannes International Film Festival in May, in the loud, chaotic bar at the Martinez Hotel, Lee Daniels seemed, as he often does, both ecstatic and nervous. He jumped, he slumped, his mood changing from giddy to anxious. He was the only black man in the crowded bar, a fact that he mentioned and then brushed away. He was dressed unremarkably in a loose, untucked shirt and slouchy khaki pants, but his hair, an electric corona of six-inch fusilli-like spirals, demanded notice. Although Daniels will be 50 this year, he has the bouncy, mercurial energy of a child. The previous night, at the gala screening of his movie “Precious,” which he directed and helped produce, he greeted the audience by saying, “I’m a little homo, I’m a little Euro and I’m a little ghetto.” The crowd cheered.

Daniels knows what he’s selling: his films combine street-smart bravado with an art-house sensibility. “Precious,” the harrowing story of a 350-pound illiterate teenage girl who is pregnant for the second time by her father and horribly abused by her mother, is shot in an almost-documentary style interspersed with fantasy sequences. (It opens Nov. 6.) Like most independent films, it is character-driven, and at its heart is a spirit of understanding. When Precious’s plight lands her in a special school, she blossoms: the audience’s initial rejection of Precious, even repulsion at the sight of her, slowly gives way to a kind of identification.

At Cannes, the film received a 15-minute standing ovation. “They wouldn’t stop clapping,” Daniels told me as he gulped a vodka. “I’m a director — after six minutes, I’m saying, please sit down. But I’m also a producer, so I’m thinking, what’s the record? Can we break the record for the longest standing ovation at the festival?”

Just a few months before its premiere at Cannes, “Precious” won three awards at the Sundance Film Festival, including a special jury prize for Mo’Nique, who plays Precious’s monstrous mother. Graphic as the film is, it is less so than “Push,” the 1996 novel on which it is based. Written by an African-American poet and writer known as Sapphire, “Push” relied on intentionally misspelled, broken and slangy English to convey Precious’s sense of despair and rage. The novel mixes poems by Precious with sexually extreme scenes, like those in which she is forced to perform oral sex on her mother. It is almost relentlessly bleak: when Precious discovers she is H.I.V.-positive, she is certain of her imminent death. Daniels’s movie, by contrast, offers a greater sense of possibility. He doesn’t ignore her disease, hardships or struggles, but he also liberates her from them. Precious is a stand-in for anyone — black, white, male, female — who has ever been devalued or underestimated.

Yet the movie is not neutral on the subject of race and the prejudices that swirl around it, even in the supposedly postracial age of Obama. “ ‘Precious’ is so not Obama,” Daniels said. “ ‘Precious’ is so not P.C. What I learned from doing the film is that even though I am black, I’m prejudiced. I’m prejudiced against people who are darker than me. When I was young, I went to a church where the lighter-skinned you were, the closer you sat to the altar. Anybody that’s heavy like Precious — I thought they were dirty and not very smart. Making this movie changed my heart. I’ll never look at a fat girl walking down the street the same way again.”

For some audiences, that may not be reason enough to make a movie that risks reinforcing old stereotypes. It’s a criticism Daniels has heard before. “As African-Americans, we are in an interesting place,” Daniels said. “Obama’s the president, and we want to aspire to that. But part of aspiring is disassociating from the face of Precious. To be honest, I was embarrassed to show this movie at Cannes. I didn’t want to exploit black people. And I wasn’t sure I wanted white French people to see our world.” He paused. “But because of Obama, it’s now O.K. to be black. I can share that voice. I don’t have to lie. I’m proud of where I come from. And I wear it like a shield. ‘Precious’ is part of that.”

Before he could untangle this thought, Daniels was interrupted by Thierry Frémaux, the director of the Cannes Film Festival, who had been sitting in a corner booth. “I love your movie,” he said. “It’s a beautiful movie.” Frémaux put out his hand to shake. “C’est incroyable!”

As Frémaux darted away, Daniels looked stunned, then gleeful, then serious. “I am so used to having two faces,” he said, as if to explain his theatrical shifts in mood. “A face that I had for black America and a face for white America. When Obama became president, I lost both faces. Now I only have one face. But old habits die hard, and sometimes I can’t remember who I’m supposed to be.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/25/magazine/25precious-t.html?_r=1&ref=magazine&pagewanted=all

Sunday, October 18, 2009

The Rockstar Opinion

The following is an op-ed by Bono, the lead singer of U2. Please read the article and respond with a summary of Bono's opinion and a response. Do you agree or disagree with his position? Why or why not?
Thank You!

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/18/opinion/18bono.html?_r=1&ref=opinion

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Zero Tolerance-Good Idea or Just Plain Silly?

The following is a link to a recent New York Times article about the zero tolerance policy for weapons in schools. Please read the article carefully and respond with a letter to the Editor stating your opinion. Do you agree or disagree with the school policy? Was it fair what happened to Zachary Christie? Why or why not? Please feel free to ask for clarification and please tell your friends that the blog entry for this week cannot be put off to Friday at 4:45!


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/12/education/12discipline.html

Monday, October 5, 2009

The Ethicist Response

Following is the response The Ethicist gave to the query posed last week. Please read it and evaluate the response. Is Randy Cohen (The Ethicist himself) correct? Please write a letter to Randy Cohen either agreeing or disagreeing with his response.

Alas, there is no way to precisely calibrate when rude changes state to unethical, like water to ice. But it’s true that to annoy those few audience members near you is bad and to hinder the performers is worse, potentially undermining the concert for everyone and thereby doing greater harm.

What’s important is when this fellow’s affliction hit. We do not condemn people for things over which they have no control, like the unexpected onset of a cold or a sudden attack of hay fever. (Although, if this fellow realized his nose-blowing would persist, he should have left the hall.) But if the honker knew or should have known before arriving at the concert that he was apt to be a nasal nuisance, even to just those around him, he had a duty to gulp down powerful decongestants or simply stay home.